Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) joined all 48 of her Senate Democratic colleagues in sending a letter urging Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Mick Mulvaney not to abandon the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s duty to protect our service members and their families under the Military Lending Act (MLA).
The MLA was passed in 2006 with bipartisan support to help safeguard active-duty military members and their families from financial fraud, predatory loans, and credit gouging. The law caps the annual interest rate for an extension of consumer credit to a service member or his or her dependents at 36%. This week, reports from the New York Times and NPR suggest that the Trump Administration is planning to suspend the routine examinations of lenders for violations of the Military Lending Act, as well as to ease financial protections for members of the military by allowing for “gap insurance” that could open up service members to getting cheated by predatory practices when they purchase cars.
The 49 Senators noted that the U.S. Department of Defense has attested to the fact that the MLA helps save U.S. taxpayer funds and that needlessly stopping proactive MLA examinations would be both inefficient and irresponsible.
“It is unreasonable to place the burden of detecting and reporting MLA abuses on service members, especially when they should be given every opportunity to focus squarely on their missions,” said the Senators. “The CFPB should not be abandoning its duty to protect our service members and their families, and we seek your commitment that you will utilize all of the authorities available to the CFPB to ensure that service members and their families continue to receive all of their MLA protections.”
The letter was led by U.S. Senators Jack Reed (D-R.I.), Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), Bill Nelson (D-Fla.), Jon Tester (D-Mont.), Joe Donnelly (D-Ind.) and Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.). The letter was also signed by U.S. Senators Mark Warner (D-Va.), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Bob Casey (D-Penn.), Doug Jones (D-Ala.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.), Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Angus King (I-Maine), Christopher Coons (D-Del.), Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.), Gary Peters (D-Mich.), Joe Manchin (D-W.V.), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Tom Udall (D-N.M.), Tom Carper (D-Del.), Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Tina Smith (D-Minn.), Ben Cardin (D-Md.), Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), and Kamala Harris (D-Calif.).
A full copy of the letter can be found here and below.
Dear Director Mulvaney:
We write regarding reports that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) will no longer protect service members and their families by including the Military Lending Act (MLA) as part of the CFPB’s routine lender examinations due to a purported lack of authority. These reports are puzzling because the CFPB already possesses the authority to enforce the MLA and examine many types of lenders for the purposes of “detecting and assessing risks to consumers and to markets for consumer financial products and services.” The CFPB should not be abandoning its duty to protect our service members and their families, and we seek your commitment that you will utilize all of the authorities available to the CFPB to ensure that service members and their families continue to receive all of their MLA protections.
By enacting the MLA, Congress sent a clear bipartisan message that high-cost lending is a clear risk to military consumers that must be addressed to also protect military readiness. Indeed, among its provisions, the MLA caps the annual interest rate for an extension of consumer credit to a service member or his or her dependents at 36%. CFPB examinations and the CFPB’s Office of Service Member Affairs have been critical components of ensuring the detection and prevention of risks to military consumers. Such examinations serve as the early warning system for MLA deficiencies so that they do not snowball into costly losses for service members and avoidable litigation costs and penalties for lenders.
Given your senior role at the Office of Management and Budget, we are sure you are aware that the MLA also helps the Department of Defense (DOD) to save taxpayer funds based on the following DOD justification for its MLA rule:
“Losing qualified Service members due to personal issues, such as financial instability, causes loss of mission capability and drives significant replacement costs. The Department estimates that each separation costs the Department $58,250. Losing an experienced mid-grade noncommissioned officer (NCO), who may be in a leadership position or key technical position, may be considerably more expensive in terms of replacement costs and in terms of the degradation of mission effectiveness resulting from a loss of personal reliability for deployment and availability for duty.”
Needlessly stopping MLA examinations altogether and choosing instead to rely on reports of MLA violations after they occurred is further perplexing given that the CFPB is already conducting lender examinations of credit products that are also subject to the MLA. Such a policy decision would be both inefficient and irresponsible to require a CFPB examiner to ignore as part of his or her examination risks to military consumers who are protected by the MLA. In addition, for our service members, especially those who are deployed overseas facing hostile fire, it is unreasonable to place the burden of detecting and reporting MLA abuses on service members, especially when they should be given every opportunity to focus squarely on their missions.
What the CFPB is reported to be contemplating is equivalent to forcing our armed forces to stop using radar, sonar, and other early warning technologies and instead react to threats as they occur. No one would force our armed forces to do so, and the CFPB should not similarly force any of its examiners to turn a blind eye. For generations, Americans have set partisanship aside and have made every effort to provide service members and their families with all the resources and protections they deserve. We ask no less of you and, as such, seek your commitment that you will continue the CFPB’s tradition of ensuring that service members and their families receive all of their MLA protections by utilizing all of the authorities available to the CFPB. We request that you respond with your commitment no later than Monday, August 20.